Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

    NCBI NCBI Logo
    Skip to main content
    Skip to navigation
    Resources
    How To
    About NCBI Accesskeys

My NCBI Sign in to NCBI Sign Out
PMC
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Search database PMC All Databases Assembly BioProject BioSample BioSystems Books ClinVar Clone Conserved Domains dbGaP dbVar EST Gene Genome GEO DataSets GEO Profiles GSS GTR HomoloGene MedGen MeSH NCBI Web Site NLM Catalog Nucleotide OMIM PMC PopSet Probe Protein Protein Clusters PubChem BioAssay PubChem Compound PubChem Substance PubMed PubMed Health SNP Sparcle SRA Structure Taxonomy ToolKit ToolKitAll ToolKitBook ToolKitBookgh UniGene
Search term
Clear input
Search

    Advanced
    Journal list
    Help

    Journal List
    HHS Author Manuscripts
    PMC4866586

Logo of nihpa
JAMA . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 13.
Published in final edited form as:
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26; 315(16): 1750–1766.
doi:  10.1001/jama.2016.4226
PMCID: PMC4866586
NIHMSID: NIHMS783419
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014
Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States
Raj Chetty , PhD, 1, 2 Michael Stepner , BA, 3 Sarah Abraham , BA, 3 Shelby Lin , MPhil, 4 Benjamin Scuderi , BA, 1 Nicholas Turner , PhD, 5 Augustin Bergeron , MA, 1 and David Cutler , PhD 1
1 Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
2 Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
3 Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
4 McKinsey and Company, New York, New York
5 Office of Tax Analysis, US Treasury, Washington, DC
Corresponding Author: Raj Chetty, PhD, Department of Economics, Stanford University, 579 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 ( Email: ude.drofnats@yttehc )
Author information ► Copyright and License information ►
Copyright notice and Disclaimer
The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at JAMA
See commentary " Relationships Between Income, Health Behaviors, and Life Expectancy. " in JAMA , volume 316 on page 880.
See commentary " The Good Life: Working Together to Promote Opportunity and Improve Population Health and Well-being. " in JAMA , volume 315 on page 1706.
See commentary " On Death and Money: History, Facts, and Explanations. " in JAMA , volume 315 on page 1703.
See commentary " Income, Life Expectancy, and Community Health: Underscoring the Opportunity. " in JAMA , volume 315 on page 1709.
This article has been corrected. See JAMA. 2017 January 03; 317(1): 90 .
See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.
Go to:
Abstract
Importance

The relationship between income and mortality is well established but remains poorly understood.
Objectives

To measure the level, temporal trend, and geographic variability in the association between income and life expectancy, and identify factors related to small area variation in this association.
Design and Setting

Income data for the US population were obtained from 1.4 billion de-identified tax records between 1999 and 2014. Mortality data were obtained from Social Security Administration death records. These data were used to estimate race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy at 40 years of age by household income percentile, sex, and geographic area, and to evaluate factors associated with differences in life expectancy.
Main Outcomes and Measures

Relationship between income and life expectancy; trends in life expectancy by income group; geographic variation in life expectancy levels and trends by income group; and factors associated with differences in life expectancy across areas.
Results

The sample consisted of 1 408 287 218 person-year observations (mean age at which individuals were analyzed, 53.0 years; median household earnings among working individuals, $61 175 per year [mean, $97 725 per year]). Among those aged 40 to 76 years, there were 4 114 380 deaths among men (mortality rate, 596.3 per 100 000) and 2 694 808 deaths among women (mortality rate, 375.1 per 100 000). The analysis yielded four results. First, higher income was associated with greater longevity throughout the income distribution. The gap in life expectancy between the richest 1% and poorest 1% of individuals was 14.6 years (95% CI, 14.4 to 14.8 years) for men and 10.1 years (95% CI, 9.9 to 10.3 years) for women. Second, inequality in life expectancy increased over time. Between 2001 and 2014, life expectancy increased by 2.34 years for men and 2.91 years for women in the top 5% of the income distribution, but increased by only 0.32 years for men and 0.04 years for women in the bottom 5% ( P < .001 for the difference for both sexes). Third, life expectancy varied substantially across local areas. For individuals in the bottom income quartile, life expectancy differed by approximately 4.5 years between areas with the highest and lowest longevity. Changes in life expectancy between 2001 and 2014 ranged from gains of more than 4 years to losses of more than 2 years across areas. Fourth, geographic differences in life expectancy for individuals in the lowest income quartile were significantly correlated with health behaviors such as smoking ( r = −0.69, P < .001), but were not significantly correlated with access to medical care, physical environmental factors, income inequality, or labor market conditions. Life expectancy for low income individuals was positively correlated with the local area fraction of immigrants ( r = 0.72, P < .001), fraction of college graduates ( r = 0.42, P < .001), and local government expenditures ( r = 0.57, P < .001).
Conclusions and Relevance

In the United States between 2001 and 2014, higher income was associated with greater longevity, and differences in life expectancy across income groups increased. However, the association between life expectancy and income varied substantially across areas; differences in longevity across income groups decreased in some areas and increased in others. The differences in life expectancy were correlated with health behaviors and local area characteristics.
Go to:
Introduction

Higher incomes are associated with longer life expectancy, 1 – 9 but several aspects of the relationship between income and longevity remain unclear. First, little is known about the exact shape of the income-longevity gradient. Is there a threshold above which additional income is no longer associated with increased life expectancy or a safety net below which further reductions in income do not harm health?

Second, there is debate about how socioeconomic gaps in longevity are changing over time. Prior work has shown that longevity gaps increased in recent decades. Some studies suggest a reduction in life expectancy for women of low socioeconomic status in recent years, but the robustness of this conclusion has been questioned. 6 , 10 – 14

Third, most studies have examined the relationship between income and longevity at a national level. To what extent do gaps in longevity vary at the local area level?

Fourth, the sources of the longevity gap remain unclear. The socioeconomic gradient in longevity has been variously attributed to factors such as inequality, economic and social stress, and differences in access to medical care. 15 These theories remain debated.

This study addressed these 4 issues by analyzing newly available data on income and mortality for the US population from 1999 through 2014. The following sets of analyses were conducted: (1) characterizing the association between life expectancy at 40 years of age and income in the United States as a whole; (2) estimating the change in life expectancy by income group from 2001 through 2014; (3) mapping geographic variation in life expectancy by income group during this period; and (4) evaluating factors associated with differences in longevity using the variation across areas.
Go to:
Methods

This study was approved by the Office of Tax Analysis of the US Treasury under Internal Revenue Code §6103(h)(1). Institutional review board approval was obtained through the Harvard University Committee on the Use of Human Subjects; participant consent was waived because the analysis used preexisting data. The analysis used a de-identified database of federal income tax and Social Security records that includes all individuals with a valid Social Security Number between 1999 and 2014.

Income data were obtained from tax records for every individual for every year from 1999 through 2014. The primary measure of income was pretax household earnings. For those who filed tax returns, household earnings were defined as adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest income minus taxable Social Security and disability benefits. For those who did not file a tax return, household earnings were defined as the sum of all wage earnings (reported on form W-2) and unemployment benefits (reported on form 1099-G). When individuals had no tax return and no information returns, household earnings were $0. For nonfilers, earnings did not include the spouse’s income. However, the vast majority of nonfilers who are not receiving Social Security benefits are single. 16 Income was adjusted to 2012 dollars using the consumer price index.

Mortality was measured using Social Security Administration (SSA) death records. Total deaths in the SSA data closely match data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), with correlations exceeding 0.96 across ages and years (part I of the eAppendix, eFigure 1, and eTable 1 in the Supplement ). Observations with income of $0 were excluded because the SSA does not fully track deaths of nonresidents and thus mortality rates for individuals with income of $0 are mismeasured. After excluding observations with income of $0, individuals were assigned percentile ranks from 1 to 100 based on their household earnings relative to all other individuals of the same sex and age in the United States during each year.
National Levels of Life Expectancy by Income

The study estimated period life expectancy, which was defined as the expected length of life for a hypothetical individual who experiences mortality rates at each subsequent age that match those in the cross-section during a given year. Period life expectancy conditional on income percentile at 40 years of age (or equivalently, expected age at death, calculated as life expectancy + 40) was constructed by (1) estimating mortality rates for the ages of 40 to 76 years; (2) extrapolating mortality rates beyond the age of 76 years and calculating life expectancy; and (3) adjusting for differences in the proportion of racial and ethnic groups across percentiles. A complete description of these 3 steps appears in part II of the eAppendix in the Supplement . The entire analysis was conducted separately for men and women.

For individuals aged 63 years or younger, mortality rates were calculated based on income percentile 2 years earlier. The 2-year lag helps mitigate reverse causality arising from income changes near death. 9 Because of this 2-year lag, mortality rates were available from 2001 through 2014. Mortality rates conditional on income percentile 2 years prior are approximately equivalent to mortality rates conditional on income percentile at the age of 40 years because individuals’ earnings are highly correlated over time between the ages of 40 years and 61 years ( eFigure 2 and eTable 2 in the Supplement ).

Earnings after the age of 62 years are less highly correlated with earnings at earlier ages because the rate of retirement increases sharply at 62 years of age, the earliest age of eligibility for Social Security benefits. 17 Therefore, income for individuals aged 63 years or older was measured at 61 years of age. Because 1999 is the earliest year in which income was observed and the mortality data end in 2014, mortality rates were calculated up to 76 years of age.

Beyond the age of 76 years, mortality rates were estimated using Gompertz models, in which mortality rates increase exponentially with age. 18 , 19 In a Gompertz model, the logarithm of the mortality rate is linear in age: log(m(age)) = α + βage. This Gompertz log-linear approximation fits NCHS data for mortality rates above 40 years of age with R 2 values of greater than 0.99 for both sexes ( eFigure 3 in the Supplement ). The log-linear approximation also fits mortality rates at specific income percentiles well (for example, R 2 > 0.99 at the 5th and 95th percentiles; Figure 1A and eFigure 4 in the Supplement ).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Gompertz Approximations and Empirical Survival Curves for Men at 5 th and 95 th Income Percentiles, 2001–2014

The Gompertz parameters α (representing the intercept of the Gompertz model) and β (representing the slope) were estimated for each sex, income percentile, and year using maximum likelihood and modeling deaths at each age using a binomial distribution. When pooling all years, mortality rates up to the age of 76 years were used to estimate α and β. When computing year-specific estimates, α and β were estimated using data up to the age of 63 years, so that all years were treated symmetrically. Because the Gompertz model fits less well after the age of 90 years, all survivors at the age of 90 years were assigned sex-specific but income-independent mortality rates based on NCHS and SSA data. 20 – 22 The mortality rate estimates were used to construct survival curves for each income percentile ( Figure 1B ) and life expectancy was calculated as the area under the survival curve.

The life expectancy estimates were adjusted to control for differences in the racial and ethnic composition of income groups in 2 steps. Data from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) were used first to estimate mortality rates by age for black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals, relative to all other groups using Gompertz models ( eFigure 5 in the Supplement ). Log differences in mortality rates across races at a given age were assumed to be constant across income groups and areas, an approximation consistent with the NLMS data ( eFigures 6 and 7 in the Supplement ). US Census data were then used to estimate the share of black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals in each income percentile by sex and year. These data were combined to calculate the mean life expectancy that would prevail if each group had proportions of black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals corresponding to US means at the age of 40 years. In both the NLMS and the US Census, race and ethnicity are reported by individuals based on fixed categories.
National Trends in Life Expectancy by Income

Year-specific estimates of life expectancy were constructed by income quartile and ventile (5 percentile bins) to reduce estimation error. Trends in life expectancy were estimated using linear regressions of race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy in each quartile or ventile by year.
Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy by Income

Individuals’ locations were defined based on the zip code from which they filed tax returns or where their W-2 forms were mailed during the year their income was measured for nonfilers. Those individuals who moved after the age of 63 years (ie, after retirement age) were therefore classified as belonging to the location where they lived at the age of 61 years (where they worked).

The level of race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy was estimated by income quartile and ventile for counties, commuting zones, and states, pooling data from 2001 through 2014. Commuting zones are geographic aggregations of counties based on commuting patterns in the 1990 Census that are widely used as measures of local labor markets. There are 741 commuting zones in the United States compared with more than 3 000 counties and more than 40 000 zip codes. The results reported are primarily for commuting zones because these zones constitute broad geographic units analogous to metropolitan statistical areas. However, unlike metropolitan statistical areas, commuting zones provide a complete partition of the country, including rural areas.

The amount of variation in life expectancy across areas was measured as the standard deviation of life expectancy across areas (weighted by population in the 2000 Census) after subtracting the variance across areas due to sampling error. Trends were estimated by regressions of year-specific race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy estimates on calendar year separately in each area. Trend estimates were constructed by income quartile for the 100 most populated commuting zones (with populations >590 000) and for states.
Correlates of Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy

Theories for differences in life expectancy were evaluated by correlating commuting zone–level estimates for individuals in the bottom and top income quartiles with local area characteristics. Detailed definitions of these characteristics and sources appear in part III of the eAppendix and in eTable 3 in the Supplement .

Health behaviors (rates of current smoking, obesity [defined as body mass index {calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared} ≥30], and exercise during the past month) were measured by income quartile from the 1996 through 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Surveys.

Measures of access to medical care included the fraction uninsured, risk-adjusted Medicare spending per enrollee, an index for the quality of inpatient care based on 30-day hospital mortality rates, and an index for the quality of primary and preventive care based on the fraction of people who visited primary care physicians and received routine care, such as mammograms, constructed using Medicare claims data. 23

Residential income segregation was measured using the Reardon rank order index; higher numbers indicate greater segregation. 24 Income inequality was estimated with the Gini index using tax records; higher numbers indicate a more unequal income distribution. Social cohesion was estimated using a social capital index based on the methods of Putnam 25 and the share of the population that is religious. The percentage of black individuals was measured in the 2000 Census.

The following measures of local labor market conditions were used as proxies for the strength of local economies: the unemployment rate in 2000, population change between 1980 and 2000, and labor force change between 1980 and 2000.

Several other correlates were constructed using Census data and other sources, for example, population density, the fraction of college graduates, and median house values (a complete list appears in eTable 3 in the Supplement ). 26
Data Analysis and Availability

The raw data were collapsed into means by sex, age, income, year, and geographic area using SAS version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc). The means by sex, age, income, year, and geographic area were analyzed using Stata version 13 (StataCorp). Tests of statistical significance were based on 2-sided tests with a significance threshold of .05. 95% confidence intervals for the race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy estimates were calculated using a bootstrap resampling procedure (part II.E of the eAppendix in the Supplement ). Correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson correlation measures, weighted by population. Data sets containing life expectancy estimates by age, sex, year, and income group at the national, state, commuting zone, and county level are available at www.healthinequality.org .
Go to:
Results

The sample consisted of 1 408 287 218 person-year observations from 1999 through 2014. The mean age at which people were analyzed was 53.0 years. Among individuals of working age (38–61 years), the median for household earnings was $61 175 per year and the mean for household earnings was $97 725 per year. Among those aged 40 to 76 years, there were 4 114 380 deaths from the SSA death files among men (mortality rate of 596.3 per 100 000) and 2 694 808 deaths among women (mortality rate of 375.1 per 100 000).
National Levels of Life Expectancy by Income

Figure 2 shows race and ethnicity-adjusted expected age at death by household income percentile, using pooled data from 2001–2014. Higher income was associated with longer life at all income levels. Men in the bottom 1% of the income distribution at the age of 40 years had an expected age of death of 72.7 years. Men in the top 1% of the income distribution had an expected age of death of 87.3 years, 14.6 years (95% CI, 14.4–14.8 years) higher than those in the bottom 1%. Women in the bottom 1% of the income distribution at the age of 40 years had an expected age of death of 78.8 years. Women in the top 1% had an expected age of death of 88.9 years, which is 10.1 years (95% CI, 9.9–10.3 years) higher than life expectancy for women in the bottom 1%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Race- and Ethnicity-Adjusted Life Expectancy for 40-Year-Olds by Household Income Percentile, 2001–2014

The gap in life expectancy between men and women narrowed with increased income levels. In the bottom 1% of the income distribution, women lived 6.0 years (95% CI, 5.9–6.2 years) longer than men; in the top 1% of the income distribution, women lived only 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.3–1.8 years) longer than men.

The relationship between life expectancy and income percentile was approximately linear above the 2 lowest income percentiles. However, the relationship between life expectancy and dollar income amount was concave ( eFigure 8 in the Supplement ). That is, an increase in income of a given dollar amount was associated with smaller gains in life expectancy at higher income levels. For example, increases in income from $14k to $20k (the 15 th vs. 20 th income percentiles), $161k to $224k (the 90 th vs. 95 th percentiles), and $224k to $1.95 million (the 95 th vs. 100 th percentiles) were all associated with approximately the same difference in life expectancy (i.e. an increase of 0.7 to 0.9 years, averaging men and women).

Estimates of life expectancy grouping individuals based on individual earnings instead of household earnings were similar, as were estimates that used Gompertz extrapolations up to the age of 100 years instead of the age of 90 years (discussions of these and other sensitivity analyses appear in part IV of the eAppendix and in eFigure 9 in the Supplement ).
National Trends in Life Expectancy by Income

The upper panels of Figure 3 show race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy for men and women by income quartile for each year from 2001 through 2014. There was a larger increase in life expectancy for higher income groups during the 2000s. For men, the mean annual increase in life expectancy from 2001 through 2014 was 0.20 years in the highest income quartile compared with only 0.08 years in the lowest income quartile ( P < .001). For women, the comparable changes were 0.23 years in the highest quartile and 0.10 years in the lowest quartile ( P < .001). These differences persisted after controlling for the higher growth rate of income for individuals in the top quartile relative to the bottom quartile ( eTable 4 in the Supplement ).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in Race- and Ethnicity-Adjusted Life Expectancy by Income Group, 2001–2014

The lower panels of Figure 3 show the annual increase in race-adjusted life expectancy by income ventiles. The annual increase in longevity was 0.18 years for men (which translates to an increase of 2.34 years from 2001–2014) and 0.22 years for women (2.91 years from 2001–2014) in the top 5% of the income distribution. In the bottom 5% of the income distribution, the annual increase in longevity was 0.02 years (0.32 years from 2001–2014) for men and 0.003 years for women (0.04 years from 2001–2014) ( P < .001 for difference between top and bottom 5% of income distributions for both sexes).
Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy by Income

Levels of Life Expectancy by Commuting Zone

Life expectancy varied significantly across areas within the United States, especially for low-income individuals. Figure 4 shows life expectancy by income ventile for New York, San Francisco, Dallas, and Detroit. There was substantial variation across these areas for low-income individuals, but little variation for high-income individuals. Life expectancy ranged from 72.3 years to 78.6 years for men in the lowest income ventile across these 4 cities; the corresponding range for men in the top ventile was 86.5 years to 87.5 years.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Race- and Ethnicity-Adjusted Life Expectancy by Income Ventile in Selected Commuting Zones, 2001–2014

The results in Figure 4 are representative of the variation across CZs more generally. The standard deviation of life expectancy across all commuting zones (weighted by population) was 1.39 years for men in the bottom income quartile vs 0.70 years in the top income quartile ( P < .001). Life expectancy varied less across areas for women than men in the bottom income quartile, and the amount of variation across commuting zones also declined with income for women ( eTable 5 in the Supplement ).

Figure 5 shows maps of expected age at death by commuting zone for men and women for the bottom and top quartiles of the US income distribution (maps for the middle-income quartiles appear in eFigure 10 in the Supplement ). For individuals in the bottom income quartile, life expectancy differed by about 5 years for men and 4 years for women between the lowest and highest longevity commuting zones ( P < .001 for both sexes). A summary of standard errors by commuting zone appears in part V.C of the eAppendix and in eFigure 11 in the Supplement .
Figure 5
Figure 5
Race- and Ethnicity-Adjusted Life Expectancy by Commuting Zone and Income Quartile, 2001–2014

Nevada, Indiana, and Oklahoma had the lowest life expectancies (<77.9 years) when men and women in the bottom income quartile were averaged. Of the 10 states with the lowest levels of life expectancy for individuals in the bottom income quartile, 8 formed a geographic belt from Michigan to Kansas (Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas). The states with the highest life expectancies for individuals in the bottom income quartile (>80.6 years) were California, New York, and Vermont. Life expectancy in the South was not significantly different from the US mean (−0.22 years, P = .47) for women but was lower (−0.96 years, P = .03) for men in the bottom income quartile. Individuals in the top income quartile had the lowest life expectancies (<85.7 years) in Nevada, Hawaii, and Oklahoma and the highest life expectancies (>87.6 years) in Utah, Washington, DC, and Vermont.

Table 1 lists the top 10 and bottom 10 commuting zones in mean life expectancy (averaging men and women) among the 100 most populated commuting zones for individuals in the bottom and top income quartiles. The expected age at death for the bottom quartile ranged from 74.2 years for men and 80.7 years for women in Gary, Indiana, to 79.5 years for men and 84.0 years for women in New York, New York. The commuting zones with highest life expectancies were clustered in California (6 of the top 10), whereas the commuting zones with the lowest life expectancies were clustered in the industrial Midwest (5 of the bottom 10). The commuting zones with the highest life expectancies for those in the bottom income quartile also had the smallest gaps in life expectancy between the top and bottom quartiles ( r = −0.82, P < .001). The expected age at death for the top income quartile ranged from 82.8 years for men and 85.3 years for women in Las Vegas, Nevada, to 86.6 years for men and 89.0 years for women in Salt Lake City, Utah. The areas with the highest and lowest life expectancies for those in the top income quartile were less clustered geographically; for example, California had commuting zones in both the top 10 and bottom 10 of the list.
Table 1
Table 1
Race and Ethnicity Adjusted Expected Age at Death by Commuting Zone and Income Quartile, 2001–2014

The differences in life expectancy across commuting zones were similar in analyses with income measures adjusted for cost of living, controls for differences across areas in the income distribution within each quartile, or measures of loss in life years up to the age of 76 years that did not make use of Gompertz extrapolations (part IV.C of the eAppendix and eTable 6 in the Supplement ). There was also considerable variation in life expectancy across counties within CZs (part V of the eAppendix, eFigure 12, and eTable 7 in the Supplement ).
Trends in Life Expectancy

Similar to levels of life expectancy, temporal trends varied significantly across geographic areas. Figure 6 maps the annual change in life expectancy between 2001 and 2014 by state for men and women in the bottom income quartile in. Hawaii, Maine, and Massachusetts had the largest gains in life expectancy (gaining >0.19 years annually) when men and women in the bottom income quartile were averaged. The states in which low-income individuals experienced the largest losses in life expectancy (losing >0.09 years annually) were Alaska, Iowa, and Wyoming.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Maps of Annual Change in Life Expectancy by State for Bottom Income Quartile, 2001–2014

Table 2 lists the top 10 and bottom 10 commuting zones in terms of trends in life expectancy (when averaging men and women) among the 100 most populated CZs for individuals in the bottom and top income quartiles. The estimated trends for individuals in the bottom income quartile ranged from an annual gain of 0.38 years in Toms River, New Jersey, to an annual loss of 0.17 years in Tampa, Florida. Gaps in life expectancy between the bottom and top income quartiles generally declined or remained stable in areas in which the bottom income quartile experienced the largest gains in life expectancy, such as Toms River, New Jersey. In contrast, gaps in life expectancy between the top and bottom income quartiles increased by approximately 0.3 years annually in places such as Tampa, Florida.
Table 2
Table 2
Trends in Race and Ethnicity Adjusted Expected Age at Death by Commuting Zone and Income Quartile, 2001–2014

Figure 7 shows race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancies by year for men and women in the bottom income quartile in 2 commuting zones in the top 10 (Birmingham, Alabama, and Cincinnati, Ohio) and 2 commuting zones in the bottom 10 (Knoxville, Tennessee, and Tampa, Florida). This Figure shows that trends in life expectancy across these areas diverged continuously throughout the 2000s. For example, life expectancy increased by approximately 3.2 years from 2001 through 2014 for men and women in Cincinnati, Ohio, but declined by approximately 2.2 years in Tampa, Florida.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Annual Change in Life Expectancy for Individuals in the Bottom Income Quartile Living in Selected Commuting Zones, 2001–2014
Correlates of Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy

Figure 8 shows correlations of commuting zone-level estimates of race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy for the bottom income quartile with local area characteristics. The correlations are divided into 6 groups: health behaviors, access to health care, environmental factors, income inequality and social cohesion, local labor market conditions, and other factors. Data for men and women are combined; correlations were similar by sex ( eTable 8 in the Supplement ). County-level correlations were also similar ( eTable 9 ).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Correlations Between Life Expectancy in the Bottom Income Quartile and Local Area Characteristics, 2001–2014
Health Behaviors

Life expectancy was negatively correlated with rates of smoking ( r = −0.69, P < .001) and obesity ( r = −0.47, P < .001) and positively correlated with exercise rates ( r = 0.32, P = .004) among individuals in the bottom income quartile. The maps for rates of smoking, obesity, and exercise for low-income individuals were similar to those for life expectancy ( eFigure 13 in the Supplement ). Consistent with these findings, the NCHS data show that the majority of the variation in mortality rates across areas among individuals in the bottom income quartile was related to medical causes, such as heart disease and cancer, rather than external causes, such as vehicle crashes, suicide, and homicide (part V.E of the eAppendix and eTable 10 in the Supplement ).
Access to Health Care

Measures of health insurance coverage and spending (the fraction of uninsured and risk-adjusted Medicare spending per enrollee) were not significantly associated with life expectancy for individuals in the bottom income quartile. Life expectancy was negatively correlated with hospital mortality rates ( r = −0.31, P < .001), but was not significantly associated with the quality of primary care.
Environmental Factors and Residential Segregation

Theories that posit differences in mortality are driven by the physical environment (eg, exposure to air pollution or a lack of access to healthy food) suggest that the gap in life expectancy between the rich and poor should be larger in more residentially segregated cities. Empirically, in areas where rich and poor are more residentially segregated, differences in life expectancy between individuals in the top and bottom income quartile were smaller ( r = −0.23, P = .09). Individuals in the bottom income quartile who live in more segregated commuting zones had higher levels of life expectancy ( r = 0.26, P = .04).
Income Inequality and Social Cohesion

Life expectancy was not significantly associated with the Gini index of income inequality for individuals in the bottom quartile of the income distribution ( r = 0.20, P = .11). Income inequality was more negatively correlated with life expectancy in the upper income quartiles (for the top quartile, r = −0.37, P < .001; Figure 9 and eFigure 14 in the Supplement ). Life expectancy for individuals in the bottom quartile was negatively correlated with the social capital index ( r = −0.26, P = .05) and not significantly associated with religiosity ( r = 0.12, P = .39). There was no significant association between race- and ethnicity-adjusted life expectancy in the bottom income quartile and the fraction of black residents in the commuting zone ( r = −0.06, P = .62). 27
Figure 9
Figure 9
Correlations Between Life Expectancy in the Top Income Quartile and Local Area Characteristics, 2001–2014
Local Labor Market Conditions

Unemployment rates, changes in population, and changes in the size of the labor force (all measures of local labor market conditions) were not significantly associated with life expectancy among individuals in the bottom income quartile.
Other Correlates

Associations between life expectancy for the bottom income quartile and 20 other factors were assessed ( eTable 8 in the Supplement ). The strongest correlates were the local area fraction of immigrants ( r = 0.72, P < .001), median house values ( r = 0.66, P < .001), local government expenditures per capita ( r = 0.57, P < .001), population density ( r = 0.48, P < .001), and the fraction of college graduates ( r = 0.42, P < .001) ( Figure 8 ). Population density and the fraction of college graduates were also significantly positively associated with trends in life expectancy across CZs for individuals in the bottom income quartile ( eFigure 15 in the Supplement ).

Similar to individuals in the bottom income quartile, small area variation in life expectancy for individuals in the top income quartile was strongly correlated with health behaviors (eg, for exercise rates, r = 0.49, P < .001) ( Figure 9 ). Correlations with measures of health care access were more mixed; for example, life expectancy was negatively correlated with Medicare expenditures per capita ( r = −0.50, P < .001) but positively associated with the index of preventive care ( r = 0.48, P < .001). There was no significant correlation with residential segregation. Income inequality was negatively correlated with life expectancy for individuals in the top income quartile ( r = −0.37, P < .001), as was the local unemployment rate ( r = −0.38, P < .001). Among the factors most strongly correlated with life expectancy in the bottom income quartile, the fraction of immigrants was negatively correlated with life expectancy in the top income quartile ( r = −0.21, P = .02), whereas the fraction of college graduates was positively correlated ( r = 0.41, P < .001) with life expectancy.
Go to:
Discussion

Addressing socioeconomic disparities in health is a major policy goal. 28 – 30 Yet the magnitude of socioeconomic gaps in life expectancy, how these gaps are changing over time, and their determinants remain debated. In this study, newly available data covering the US population were used to obtain more comprehensive and precise estimates of the relationship between income and life expectancy at the national level than was feasible in prior work. New local area estimates of life expectancy by income were calculated and factors that were correlated with higher life expectancy for individuals with low incomes were identified. The analysis yielded 4 major conclusions.
National Levels of Life Expectancy by Income

First, life expectancy increased continuously with income. There was no dividing line above or below which higher income was not associated with higher life expectancy. Between the top 1% and bottom 1% of the income distribution, life expectancy differed by 15 years for men and 10 years for women (Box).

These differences are placed in perspective by comparing life expectancies at selected percentiles of the income distribution (among those with positive income) in the United States with mean life expectancies in other countries ( eFigure 16 in the Supplement ). For example, men in the bottom 1% of the income distribution at the age of 40 years in the United States have life expectancies similar to the mean life expectancy for 40-year-old men in Sudan and Pakistan, assuming that life expectancies in those countries are accurate. Men in the United States in the top 1% of the income distribution have higher life expectancies than the mean life expectancy for men in all countries. 31 The 10-year gap in life expectancy between women in the top 1% and bottom 1% of the US income distribution is equivalent to the decrement in longevity from lifetime smoking. 32
National Trends in Life Expectancy by Income

Second, inequality in life expectancy increased in recent years. Between 2001 and 2014, individuals in the top 1% of income distribution gained around 3 years of life expectancy, whereas individuals in the bottom 1% experienced no gains. As a benchmark for this magnitude, the NCHS estimates that eliminating all cancer deaths would increase life expectancy at birth by 3.2 years. 33

This finding of increasing gaps in longevity supports the conclusions of recent studies using smaller samples. 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 14 However, the finding that life expectancy for low-income women has not changed in recent years contrasts with the findings by Olshansky et al 11 that life expectancy has declined for women without a high school degree. The results in this study may differ because the group of people without a high school degree is an increasingly selected sample. 13

Case and Deaton 34 and Gelman and Auerbach 35 also showed that age-adjusted mortality rates for white men aged 45 to 54 years were constant or increasing during the 2000s. Our finding of increasing life expectancy across most income groups differs from this result because our estimates incorporate declines in mortality rates at older ages, pool all races, and exclude individuals with 0 earnings at the age of 40 years. However, our finding of increasing inequality in life expectancy across income groups is consistent with the findings by Case and Deaton 34 that among whites, mortality rates increased most rapidly for individuals with low levels of education.
Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy by Income

Third, life expectancy varied substantially across local areas. Among individuals in the bottom quartile of the income distribution, life expectancy differed by about 4 years for women and 5 years for men between commuting zones with the lowest and highest longevity. Trends in life expectancy during the 2000s varied substantially across areas as well, ranging from gains of more than 4 years between 2001 and 2014 in some commuting zones to losses of more than 2 years in others. These small area differences suggest that the increasing inequality in health outcomes in the United States as a whole is not immutable.

Prior work documenting geographic variation in longevity has been unable to disaggregate the variability across areas by income. 36 – 38 Disaggregating by income is important. When pooling all income groups, life expectancy in the South was well below average ( eFigure 17 in the Supplement ). 36 – 41 However, among individuals in the bottom income quartile, life expectancy in the South was more similar to the US mean. The low level of life expectancy in the South documented in prior work is explained primarily by lower income levels rather than poorer health conditional on income. Among the population with low-income levels, the lowest life expectancy was found in Oklahoma and in cities in the rust belt, such as Gary, Indiana, and Toledo, Ohio. There was also a substantial difference in life expectancy between low-income individuals in Nevada and Utah, as first documented by Fuchs. 42
Correlates of Local Area Variation in Life Expectancy

Fourth, the variation in life expectancy across small areas was used as a lens to evaluate theories for socioeconomic differences in longevity. Understanding the characteristics of areas where low-income individuals live longer may yield insights into the determinants of longevity for low-income populations more broadly. The differences in life expectancy across areas were highly correlated with health behaviors (eg, smoking, obesity, and exercise), suggesting that any theory for differences in life expectancy across areas must explain differences in health behaviors.

One such theory is that health and longevity are related to differences in medical care. 43 – 51 The present analysis provides limited support for this theory. Life expectancy for low income individuals was not significantly correlated with measures of the quantity and quality of medical care provided, such as the fraction insured and measures of preventive care. The lack of a change in the mortality rates of individuals in the lowest income quartile ( Figure 1 ) when they become eligible for Medicare coverage at the age of 65 years further supports the conclusion that a lack of access to care is not the primary reason that low-income individuals have shorter life expectancies. 50 , 51

A second theory is that physical aspects of the local environment affect health, for example through exposure to air pollution. 52 – 59 Such theories predict that income gaps in longevity should be greater in areas with greater residential segregation by income. This explanation also does not find strong empirical support. Life expectancy among individuals in the lowest income quartile was higher in more segregated areas—both in absolute terms and relative to individuals in the highest income quartile.

A third theory is that poor health is related to inequality or a lack of social cohesion, which may increase stress for low-income individuals. 60 , 61 Consistent with prior work, in the current study the Gini index of income inequality was negatively correlated with average life expectancy across commuting zones when pooling all income groups ( r = −0.36; P = .002). 38 However, this correlation is partly driven by areas with more inequality having a larger share of individuals in low-income quartiles, which is associated with lower mean life expectancy because the relationship between income and longevity is concave ( eFigure 7 in the Supplement ). 62 – 64 Among individuals in the bottom income quartile, there was no association between inequality and life expectancy across areas, consistent with the findings of Lochner et al 65 based on multilevel data.

Inequality was more negatively correlated with life expectancy for individuals in the highest income quartile, contrary to the prediction that inequality has adverse effects on the health of low-income individuals. At the state level, the correlations between inequality and life expectancy were negative when pooling all income groups, consistent with evidence reviewed by Wilkinson and Pickett, 66 but the correlation with life expectancy in the bottom income quartile was positive. There was also no positive correlation between other measures of social cohesion (ie, social capital and participation in religious organizations) and life expectancy for individuals in the lowest income quartile. 25 , 67 – 71

A fourth theory is that life expectancy is related to local labor market conditions. 72 , 73 Empirically, neither unemployment nor long-term population and labor force change were significantly associated with life expectancy for individuals in the lowest income quartile.

None of the 4 theories for low levels of life expectancy among low-income individuals were consistently supported by the data. Rather, the strongest pattern in the data was that low-income individuals tend to live longest (and have more healthful behaviors) in affluent cities with highly educated populations and high levels of government expenditures, such as New York, New York, and San Francisco, California. In these cities, life expectancy for individuals in the bottom 5% of the income distribution was approximately 80 years. In contrast, in less affluent cities, such as Gary, Indiana, and Detroit, Michigan, expected age at death for individuals in the bottom 5% of the income distribution was approximately 75 years. Low-income individuals living in cities with highly educated populations also experienced the largest gains in life expectancy during the 2000s.

There are many potential explanations for why low-income individuals who live in affluent, highly educated cities live longer. Such areas may have public policies that restrict smoking or greater funding for public services, consistent with the higher levels of local government expenditures in these areas. Low income individuals who live in high-income areas may also be influenced by living in the vicinity of other individuals who behave in healthier ways. Alternatively, the low-income population in such cities might have different characteristics, consistent with the larger share of immigrants in these areas. Testing between these theories is a key area for future research.
Implications for Practice and Policy

The small area variation in the association between life expectancy and income suggests that gaps in longevity may require local policy responses. For example, health professionals could make targeted efforts to improve health among low-income populations in cities, such as Las Vegas, Nevada, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The strong association between geographic variation in life expectancy and health behaviors suggests that policy interventions should focus on changing health behaviors among low-income individuals. Tax policies and other local public policies may play a role in inducing such changes. The publicly available data at www.healthinequality.org (listed in eTable 11 in the Supplement ) provide a way to monitor local progress.

The findings also have implications for social insurance programs. The differences in life expectancy by income imply that the Social Security program is less redistributive than implied by its progressive benefit structure. Men and women in the top 1% of the income distribution can expect to claim Social Security and Medicare for 11.8 and 8.3 more years than men and women in the bottom 1% of the income distribution. Some have proposed indexing the age of eligibility for Medicare and full Social Security benefits to increases in life expectancy. 74 The differences in the increases in life expectancy across income groups and areas suggests that such a policy would have to be conditioned on income and location to maintain current levels of progressivity. 12
Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the life expectancy estimates relied on extrapolations of mortality rates after the age of 76 years (and the age of 63 years for the year-specific estimates). Although the geographic variation remains similar without extrapolating beyond the age of 76 years and the national NCHS data support these extrapolations, further work is needed to ensure their accuracy across income subgroups and geographic areas. The life expectancy estimates by year do not incorporate factors that may have affected mortality rates only after the age of 63 years, such as Medicare Part D in 2006.

Second, the relationships between income and life expectancy should not be interpreted as the causal effects of having more money because income is correlated with other attributes that directly affect health. 75 Because of such unmeasured confounding factors, the causal effects of income on life expectancy are likely to be smaller than the associations documented in this study. In addition, the local area variation need not reflect the causal effects of living in a particular area and may be driven by differences in the characteristics of the residents of each area. Although the correlational analysis in this study cannot establish causal mechanisms, it is a step toward determining which theories for disparities in longevity deserve further consideration.

Third, some of the measures used (eg, the percentage of religiosity to represent social cohesion) are constructed based on limited empirical data. However, we are unaware of better measures that could have been used as proxies for the various constructs of interest.
Go to:
Conclusions

In the United States between 2001 and 2014, higher income was associated with greater longevity throughout the income distribution, and differences in life expectancy across income groups increased during this period. However, the association between life expectancy and income varied substantially across geographic areas; differences in longevity across income groups decreased in some areas and increased in others. The differences in life expectancy were correlated with health behaviors and local area characteristics.
​
Key Messages

    Life expectancy increases continuously with income. At the age of 40 years, the gap in life expectancy between individuals in the top and bottom 1% of the income distribution in the United States is 15 years for men and 10 years for women.
    For individuals in the bottom income quartile, life expectancy at the age of 40 years differs by about 4.5 years between the commuting zones with the highest and lowest life expectancies. Adjusting for race and ethnicity, life expectancy for individuals with low incomes is lowest in Nevada, Indiana, and Oklahoma and highest in California, New York, and Vermont.
    Gaps in life expectancy by income increased between 2001 and 2014. Life expectancy did not change for individuals in the lowest quartile of the income distribution, whereas it increased by about 3 years for men and women in the top quartile of the income distribution. These changes varied significantly across geographic areas. The gap in life expectancy between the lowest and highest income quartiles decreased in some areas, such as areas within New Jersey and Alabama, but increased by more than 3 years in other areas, such as areas within Florida.
    Correlational analysis of the differences in life expectancy across geographic areas did not provide strong support for 4 leading explanations for socioeconomic differences in longevity: differences in access to medical care (as measured by health insurance coverage and proxies for the quality and quantity of primary care), environmental differences (as measured by residential segregation), adverse effects of inequality (as measured by Gini indices), and labor market conditions (as measured by unemployment rates). Rather, most of the variation in life expectancy across geographic areas was related to differences in health behaviors, including smoking, obesity, and exercise. Individuals in the lowest income quartile have more healthful behaviors and live longer in areas with more immigrants, higher home prices, and more college graduates.

Go to:
Supplementary Material
Appendix
Click here to view. (2.8M, pdf)
Go to:
Acknowledgments

Funding/Support: This research was supported by the US Social Security Administration (SSA) through grant RRC08098400-07 to the National Bureau of Economic Research as part of the SSA Retirement Research Consortium, and through funding from the National Institutes of Health, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Smith Richardson Foundation, and Laura and John Arnold Foundation.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: We thank Frina Lin, BA, and Jeremy Majerovitz, BA, who provided outstanding research assistance and were compensated for their work. We also thank Amitabh Chandra, PhD, Victor Fuchs, PhD, and Jonathan Skinner, PhD, for providing helpful comments but were not compensated.
Go to:
Footnotes

Author Contributions: Dr Chetty had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Chetty, Stepner, Cutler.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: All authors.

Obtained funding: Chetty, Cutler.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Stepner, Abraham, Lin, Scuderi, Turner, Bergeron, Cutler.

Study supervision: Chetty, Cutler.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Cutler reported being on the academic and policy advisory board for Kyruss Inc and receiving a small amount of stock for doing so (Kyruss Inc provides software solutions to help provider organizations match patients to health care providers, improve the quality of referral and appointment scheduling processes, and optimize health care provider capacity); having nonpaid positions at the Institute of Medicine, Alliance for Aging Research, National Bureau of Economic Research, Aging, Health Care, Public Economics, and Productivity programs, Employee Benefit Research Institute, National Academy of Social Insurance, Institute for Research on Poverty, Center for American Progress, and Center for Healthcare Transparency; receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health; and receiving personal fees from Novartis Princeton, MedForce, Veterans Health Administration, International Monetary Fund, National Council and Community Behavioral Healthcare, Delaware Health Sciences Alliance, Dartmouth College, Healthcare Financial Management Association, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Robert W. Baird & Co, Healthcare Billing and Management Association, Cadence Health, Pompeu Fabra University, Aon Hewitt, American Health Lawyers Association, Parenteral Drug Association, UBS, Aetna, Toshiba, Ernst and Young, Yale University, Bank of America Webinar, and New York University. No other disclosures were reported.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Internal Revenue Service, the US Treasury Department, the Social Security Administration, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. This article used data obtained from the public use file of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, the US Bureau of the Census, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Aging, the National Center for Health Statistics, or any other agency of the federal government.

Go to:
References
1. Kitagawa E, Hauser P. Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in Socioeconomic Epidemiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1973.
2. Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005; 365 (9464):1099–1104. Medline:15781105 . [ PubMed ]
3. Cutler D, Deaton A, Lleras-Muney A. The determinants of mortality. J Econ Perspect. 2006; 20 :97–120.
4. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, et al. European Union Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358 (23):2468–2481. Medline:18525043 . [ PubMed ]
5. Berkman L, Kawachi I, Glymour M. Social Epidemiology. 2nd. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2014.
6. Waldron H. Mortality differentials by lifetime earnings decile: implications for evaluations of proposed Social Security law changes. Soc Secur Bull. 2013; 73 (1):1–37. Medline:23687740 . [ PubMed ]
7. Duggan JE, Gillingham R, Greenlees J. Mortality and lifetime income: evidence from US Social Security records. IMF Staff Papers. 2008; 55 (4):566–594.
8. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR, Pamuk E. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100 (suppl 1):S186–S196. Medline:20147693 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
9. Cristia J. The Empirical Relationship Between Lifetime Earnings and Mortality. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2007.
10. Meara ER, Richards S, Cutler DM. The gap gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27 (2):350–360. Medline:18332489 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
11. Olshansky SJ, Antonucci T, Berkman L, et al. Differences in life expectancy due to race and educational differences are widening, and many may not catch up. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (8):1803–1813. Medline:22869659 . [ PubMed ]
12. National Academy of Science Engineering and Medicine. The Growing Gap in Life Expectancy by Income: Implications for Federal Programs and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015. [ PubMed ]
13. Bound J, Geronimus A, Rodriguez J, Waidmann T. The Implications of Differential Trends in Mortality for Social Security Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2014.
14. Bosworth B, Burtless G, Zhang K. Later Retirement, Inequality in Old Age, and the Growing Gap in Longevity Between Rich and Poor. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2016.
15. Woolf SH, Braveman P. Where health disparities begin: the role of social and economic determinants—and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30 (10):1852–1859. Medline:21976326 . [ PubMed ]
16. Cilke J. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; A profile of non-filers. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/ota78.pdf .
17. Coile C, Gruber J. The effect of Social Security on retirement in the United States. Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-estimation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004. pp. 691–730.
18. Gompertz B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1825; 115 :513–585. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
19. Preston S, Heuveline P, Guillot M. Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2000.
20. Olshansky SJ. On the biodemography of aging: a review essay. Popul Dev Rev. 1998; 24 :381–393.
21. Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS. Mortality measurement at advanced ages: a study of the Social Security Administration death master file. N Am Actuar J. 2011; 15 (3):432–447. Medline:22308064 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
22. Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA. Ever since Gompertz. Demography. 1997; 34 (1):1–15. Medline:9074828 . [ PubMed ]
23. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes. JAMA. 2014; 312 (16):1644–1652. Medline:25335146 . [ PubMed ]
24. Reardon S. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; Measures of income segregation. http://inequality.stanford.edu/_media/working_papers/reardon_measures-income-seg.pdf .
25. Putnam R. Bowling Alone. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
26. Chetty R, Hendren N, Kline P, Saez E. Where is the land of opportunity: the geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Q J Econ. 2014; 129 :1553–1623.
27. Deaton A, Lubotsky D. Mortality, inequality and race in American cities and states. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56 (6):1139–1153. Medline:12600354 . [ PubMed ]
28. US Department of Health and Human Services. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; Healthy People 2010. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2010/
29. US Department of Health and Human Services. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; Healthy People 2020. https://www.healthypeople.gov/
30. Noble DJ, Casalino LP. Can accountable care organizations improve population health?: should they try? JAMA. 2013; 309 (11):1119–1120. Medline:23512057 . [ PubMed ]
31. World Health Organization. [Accessed October 1, 2015]; Global Health Observatory Data Repository. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.60770?lang=en .
32. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368 (4):341–350. Medline:23343063 . [ PubMed ]
33. Arias E, Heron M, Tejada-Vera B. United States life tables eliminating certain causes of death, 1999–2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013; 61 (9):1–128. Medline:24968617 . [ PubMed ]
34. Case A, Deaton A. Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112 (49):15078–15083. Medline:26575631 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
35. Gelman A, Auerbach J. Age-aggregation bias in mortality trends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113 (7):E816–E817. Medline:26858421 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
36. Murray CJ, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, et al. Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. PLoS Med. 2006; 3 (9):e260. Medline:16968116 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
37. Kulkarni SC, Levin-Rector A, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Falling behind: life expectancy in US counties from 2000 to 2007 in an international context. Popul Health Metr. 2011; 9 (1):16. Medline:21672269 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
38. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, et al. Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88 (7):1074–1080. Medline:9663157 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
39. Ezzati M, Friedman AB, Kulkarni SC, Murray CJ. The reversal of fortunes: trends in county mortality and cross-county mortality disparities in the United States. PLoS Med. 2008; 5 (4):e66. Medline:18433290 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
40. Wang H, Schumacher AE, Levitz CE, Mokdad AH, Murray CJ. Left behind: widening disparities for males and females in US county life expectancy, 1985–2010. Popul Health Metr. 2013; 11 (1):8. Medline:23842281 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
41. Kindig DA, Cheng ER. Even as mortality fell in most US counties, female mortality nonetheless rose in 42.8 percent of counties from 1992 to 2006. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 (3):451–458. Medline:23459723 . [ PubMed ]
42. Fuchs V. Who Shall Live? New York, NY: Basic Books; 1974.
43. Skinner J. Causes and consequences of regional variations in health care. In: Pauly M, McGuire T, Barros P, editors. Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2012.
44. Doyle J, Graves J, Gruber J, Kleiner S. Measuring returns to hospital care: evidence from ambulance referral patterns. J Polit Econ. 2015; 123 (1):170–214. Medline:25750459 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
45. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending, part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 (4):273–287. Medline:12585825 . [ PubMed ]
46. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending, part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 (4):288–298. Medline:12585826 . [ PubMed ]
47. Almond D, Doyle JJ, Kowalski AE, Williams H. Estimating marginal returns to medical care: evidence from at-risk newborns. Q J Econ. 2010; 125 (2):591–634. Medline:20634927 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
48. Doyle JJ., Jr Returns to local-area healthcare spending: evidence from health shocks to patients far from home. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2011; 3 (3):221–243. Medline:23853699 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
49. Barnato AE, Chang CC, Farrell MH, Lave JR, Roberts MS, Angus DC. Is survival better at hospitals with higher “end-of-life” treatment intensity? Med Care. 2010; 48 (2):125–132. Medline:20057328 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
50. Card D, Dobkin C, Maestas N. Does Medicare save lives? Q J Econ. 2009; 124 (2):597–636. Medline:19920880 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
51. Finkelstein A, McKnight R. What did Medicare do? the initial impact of Medicare on mortality and out of pocket medical spending. J Public Econ. 2008; 92 :1644–1668.
52. Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Curry S, et al. Community-level comparisons between the grocery store environment and individual dietary practices. Prev Med. 1991; 20 (2):250–261. Medline:2057471 . [ PubMed ]
53. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36 (1):74–81. Medline:18977112 . [ PubMed ]
54. Walker RE, Keane CR, Burke JG. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: a review of food deserts literature. Health Place. 2010; 16 (5):876–884. Medline:20462784 . [ PubMed ]
55. Cobb LK, Appel LJ, Franco M, Jones-Smith JC, Nur A, Anderson CAM. The relationship of the local food environment with obesity: a systematic review of methods, study quality, and results. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23 (7):1331–1344. Medline:26096983 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
56. Currie J, Neidell M. Air pollution and infant health: what can we learn from California’s recent experience? Q J Econ. 2005; 120 :1003–1030.
57. Dockery DW, Pope CA, III, Xu X, et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329 (24):1753–1759. Medline:8179653 . [ PubMed ]
58. Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, Coursac I, Zeger SL. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343 (24):1742–1749. Medline:11114312 . [ PubMed ]
59. Caiazzo F, Ashok A, Waitz IA, Yim SHL, Barrett SRH. Air pollution and early deaths in the United States, part I: quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005. Atmos Environ. 2013; 79 :198–208.
60. Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper S, et al. Is income inequality a determinant of population health? part 1: a systematic review. Milbank Q. 2004; 82 (1):5–99. Medline:15016244 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
61. Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG. Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 128 (128):316–326. Medline:25577953 . [ PubMed ]
62. Gravelle H. How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact? BMJ. 1998; 316 (7128):382–385. Medline:9487182 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
63. Subramanian SV, Blakely T, Kawachi I. Income inequality as a public health concern: where do we stand? commentary on “Is exposure to income inequality a public health concern” Health Serv Res. 2003; 38 (1 pt 1):153–167. Medline:12650386 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
64. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us? Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21 :543–567. Medline:10884964 . [ PubMed ]
65. Lochner K, Pamuk E, Makuc D, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I. State-level income inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel study. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91 (3):385–391. Medline:11236402 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
66. Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62 (7):1768–1784. Medline:16226363 . [ PubMed ]
67. Hummer RA, Rogers RG, Nam CB, Ellison CG. Religious involvement and US adult mortality. Demography. 1999; 36 (2):273–285. Medline:10332617 . [ PubMed ]
68. McCullough ME, Hoyt WT, Larson DB, Koenig HG, Thoresen C. Religious involvement and mortality: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 2000; 19 (3):211–222. Medline:10868765 . [ PubMed ]
69. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87 (9):1491–1498. Medline:9314802 . [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
70. Lochner KA, Kawachi I, Brennan RT, Buka SL. Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56 (8):1797–1805. Medline:12639596 . [ PubMed ]
71. Choi M, Mesa-Frias M, Nüesch E, et al. Social capital, mortality, cardiovascular events and cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43 (6):1895–1920. Medline:25369975 . [ PubMed ]
72. Sullivan D, von Wachter T. Job displacement and mortality: an analysis using administrative data. Q J Econ. 2009; 124 :1265–1306.
73. Ruhm CJ. Are recessions good for your health? Q J Econ. 2000; 115 :617–650.
74. National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. [Accessed March 28, 2016]; The moment of truth. https://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf .
75. Cesarini D, Lindqvist E, Östling R, Wallace B. Wealth, health and child development: evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. Q J Econ

    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    Supplementary Material
    Acknowledgments
    Footnotes
    References

Formats:

    Article
    |
    PubReader
    |
    ePub (beta)
    |
    PDF (2.5M)
    |
    Citation

Share

    Share on Facebook Facebook
    Share on Twitter Twitter
    Share on Google Plus Google+

Save items
Add to Favorites View more options

    Create collection...
    Manage collections...

loading
Similar articles in PubMed

    Trends in mortality differentials and life expectancy for male social security-covered workers, by socioeconomic status. [Soc Secur Bull. 2007]
    Waldron H. Soc Secur Bull. 2007; 67(3):1-28.
    Poverty and mortality among the elderly: measurement of performance in 33 countries 1960-92. [Trop Med Int Health. 1997]
    Wang J, Jamison DT, Bos E, Vu MT. Trop Med Int Health. 1997 Oct; 2(10):1001-10.
    The future of life expectancy and life expectancy inequalities in England and Wales: Bayesian spatiotemporal forecasting. [Lancet. 2015]
    Bennett JE, Li G, Foreman K, Best N, Kontis V, Pearson C, Hambly P, Ezzati M. Lancet. 2015 Jul 11; 386(9989):163-70. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
    Changing factors and changing needs in women's health care. [Nurs Clin North Am. 1986]
    Leslie LA, Swider SM. Nurs Clin North Am. 1986 Mar; 21(1):111-23.
    Life expectancy in Canada--an overview. [Health Rep. 1990]
    Adams O. Health Rep. 1990; 2(4):361-76.

See reviews... See all...
Cited by other articles in PMC

    The Obama Years: Tepid Palliation for America’s Health Scourges [American Journal of Public Hea...]
    Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. American Journal of Public Health. 2017 Jan; 107(1): 22-24
    BEHAVIOR ANALYSTS IN THE WAR ON POVERTY: A REVIEW OF THE USE OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO PROMOTE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT [Journal of the experimental an...]
    Holtyn AF, Jarvis BP, Silverman K. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior. 2017 Jan 11; 107(1): 9-20
    Socioeconomic, remoteness and sex differences in life expectancy in New South Wales, Australia, 2001–2012: a population-based study [BMJ Open. 2017]
    Stephens AS, Gupta L, Thackway S, Broome RA. BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 10; 7(1): e013227
    Burden of disease associated with lower levels of income among US adults aged 65 and older [BMJ Open. 2017]
    Lubetkin EI, Jia H. BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16; 7(1): e013720
    Life Expectancies in Hawai‘i: A Multi-ethnic Analysis of 2010 Life Tables
    Wu Y, Braun K, Onaka AT, Horiuchi BY, Tottori CJ, Wilkens L. Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health. 2017 Jan; 76(1): 9-14

See all...
Links

    PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
    Taxonomy
    Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry

Recent Activity
Clear Turn Off Turn On

    The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–20...
    The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014
    NIHPA Author Manuscripts. 2016 Apr 26; 315(16)1750
    Fertility Transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa Different?
    Fertility Transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa Different?
    NIHPA Author Manuscripts. 2013 Feb; 38(Suppl 1)153
    Aging in the Natural World: Comparative Data Reveal Similar Mortality Patterns A...
    Aging in the Natural World: Comparative Data Reveal Similar Mortality Patterns Across Primates
    NIHPA Author Manuscripts. 2011 Mar 11; 331(6022)1325
    Female and male life tables for seven wild primate species
    Female and male life tables for seven wild primate species
    Scientific Data. 2016; 3()
    Killing Me Softly: The Fetal Origins Hypothesis
    Killing Me Softly: The Fetal Origins Hypothesis
    NIHPA Author Manuscripts. Summer 2011; 25(3)153

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on
See more...

    Mortality differentials by lifetime earnings decile: implications for evaluations of proposed Social Security law changes. [Soc Secur Bull. 2013]
    Waldron H
    Soc Secur Bull. 2013; 73(1):1-37.
    The gap gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981-2000. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2008]
    Meara ER, Richards S, Cutler DM
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr; 27(2):350-60.

    Where health disparities begin: the role of social and economic determinants--and why current policies may make matters worse. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2011]
    Woolf SH, Braveman P
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct; 30(10):1852-9.

    Review Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) 'On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies'. [Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015]
    Kirkwood TB
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 19; 370(1666):.

    Ever since Gompertz. [Demography. 1997]
    Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA
    Demography. 1997 Feb; 34(1):1-15.

    Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes. [JAMA. 2014]
    Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK
    JAMA. 2014 Oct 22-29; 312(16):1644-52.

    Mortality, inequality and race in American cities and states. [Soc Sci Med. 2003]
    Deaton A, Lubotsky D
    Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar; 56(6):1139-53.

    Can accountable care organizations improve population health?: should they try? [JAMA. 2013]
    Noble DJ, Casalino LP
    JAMA. 2013 Mar 20; 309(11):1119-20.

    21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. [N Engl J Med. 2013]
    Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, Rostron B, Thun M, Anderson RN, McAfee T, Peto R
    N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24; 368(4):341-50.

    United States life tables eliminating certain causes of death, 1999-2001. [Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013]
    Arias E, Heron M, Tejada-Vera B
    Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 May 31; 61(9):1-128.

    Mortality differentials by lifetime earnings decile: implications for evaluations of proposed Social Security law changes. [Soc Secur Bull. 2013]
    Waldron H
    Soc Secur Bull. 2013; 73(1):1-37.
    The gap gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981-2000. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2008]
    Meara ER, Richards S, Cutler DM
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr; 27(2):350-60.
    Differences in life expectancy due to race and educational differences are widening, and many may not catch up. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2012]
    Olshansky SJ, Antonucci T, Berkman L, Binstock RH, Boersch-Supan A, Cacioppo JT, Carnes BA, Carstensen LL, Fried LP, Goldman DP, Jackson J, Kohli M, Rother J, Zheng Y, Rowe J
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug; 31(8):1803-13.

See more ...

    Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. [Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015]
    Case A, Deaton A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8; 112(49):15078-83.
    Age-aggregation bias in mortality trends. [Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016]
    Gelman A, Auerbach J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 16; 113(7):E816-7.

    Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. [PLoS Med. 2006]
    Murray CJ, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, Tomijima N, Bulzacchelli MT, Iandiorio TJ, Ezzati M
    PLoS Med. 2006 Sep; 3(9):e260.
    Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. [Am J Public Health. 1998]
    Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, Cohen RD, Heck KE, Balfour JL, Yen IH
    Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul; 88(7):1074-80.
    Even as mortality fell in most US counties, female mortality nonetheless rose in 42.8 percent of counties from 1992 to 2006. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2013]
    Kindig DA, Cheng ER
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar; 32(3):451-8.

    DOES MEDICARE SAVE LIVES? [Q J Econ. 2009]
    Card D, Dobkin C, Maestas N
    Q J Econ. 2009; 124(2):597-636.

    Community-level comparisons between the grocery store environment and individual dietary practices. [Prev Med. 1991]
    Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Curry S, Wagner E, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kristal A
    Prev Med. 1991 Mar; 20(2):250-61.

    Review Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. [Milbank Q. 2004]
    Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper S, Hillemeier M, Ross N, Kaplan GA, Wolfson M
    Milbank Q. 2004; 82(1):5-99.
    Review Income inequality and health: a causal review. [Soc Sci Med. 2015]
    Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG
    Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar; 128():316-26.
    Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. [Am J Public Health. 1998]
    Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, Cohen RD, Heck KE, Balfour JL, Yen IH
    Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul; 88(7):1074-80.
    Review How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact? [BMJ. 1998]
    Gravelle H
    BMJ. 1998 Jan 31; 316(7128):382-5.
    Review Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us? [Annu Rev Public Health. 2000]
    Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E
    Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21():543-67.
    State-level income inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel study. [Am J Public Health. 2001]
    Lochner K, Pamuk E, Makuc D, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I
    Am J Public Health. 2001 Mar; 91(3):385-91.

See more ...

    Review Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. [Soc Sci Med. 2006]
    Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE
    Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr; 62(7):1768-84.
    Religious involvement and U.S. adult mortality. [Demography. 1999]
    Hummer RA, Rogers RG, Nam CB, Ellison CG
    Demography. 1999 May; 36(2):273-85.
    Review Social capital, mortality, cardiovascular events and cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. [Int J Epidemiol. 2014]
    Choi M, Mesa-Frias M, Nuesch E, Hargreaves J, Prieto-Merino D, Bowling A, Snith GD, Ebrahim S, Dale C, Casas JP
    Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec; 43(6):1895-920.

    Review [. 2015]
    Committee on the Long-Run Macroeconomic Effects of the Aging U.S. Population—Phase II, Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Mathematical Sciences and Their Applications, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
    . 2015 Sep 17; ():.

1. Kitagawa E, Hauser P. Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in Socioeconomic Epidemiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1973. [ Ref list ]
9. Cristia J. The Empirical Relationship Between Lifetime Earnings and Mortality. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2007. [ Ref list ]
Mortality differentials by lifetime earnings decile: implications for evaluations of proposed Social Security law changes.
Waldron H
Soc Secur Bull. 2013; 73(1):1-37.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
The gap gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981-2000.
Meara ER, Richards S, Cutler DM
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr; 27(2):350-60.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
14. Bosworth B, Burtless G, Zhang K. Later Retirement, Inequality in Old Age, and the Growing Gap in Longevity Between Rich and Poor. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2016. [ Ref list ]
Where health disparities begin: the role of social and economic determinants--and why current policies may make matters worse.
Woolf SH, Braveman P
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct; 30(10):1852-9.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
16. Cilke J. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; A profile of non-filers. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/ota78.pdf . [ Ref list ]
17. Coile C, Gruber J. The effect of Social Security on retirement in the United States. Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-estimation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004. pp. 691–730. [ Ref list ]
Review Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) 'On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies'.
Kirkwood TB
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 19; 370(1666):.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
19. Preston S, Heuveline P, Guillot M. Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2000. [ Ref list ]
20. Olshansky SJ. On the biodemography of aging: a review essay. Popul Dev Rev. 1998; 24 :381–393. [ Ref list ]
Ever since Gompertz.
Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA
Demography. 1997 Feb; 34(1):1-15.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes.
Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK
JAMA. 2014 Oct 22-29; 312(16):1644-52.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
24. Reardon S. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; Measures of income segregation. http://inequality.stanford.edu/_media/working_papers/reardon_measures-income-seg.pdf . [ Ref list ]
25. Putnam R. Bowling Alone. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 2000. [ Ref list ]
26. Chetty R, Hendren N, Kline P, Saez E. Where is the land of opportunity: the geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Q J Econ. 2014; 129 :1553–1623. [ Ref list ]
Mortality, inequality and race in American cities and states.
Deaton A, Lubotsky D
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar; 56(6):1139-53.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
28. US Department of Health and Human Services. [Accessed March 23, 2016]; Healthy People 2010. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2010/ [ Ref list ]
Can accountable care organizations improve population health?: should they try?
Noble DJ, Casalino LP
JAMA. 2013 Mar 20; 309(11):1119-20.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
31. World Health Organization. [Accessed October 1, 2015]; Global Health Observatory Data Repository. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.60770?lang=en . [ Ref list ]
21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States.
Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, Rostron B, Thun M, Anderson RN, McAfee T, Peto R
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24; 368(4):341-50.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
United States life tables eliminating certain causes of death, 1999-2001.
Arias E, Heron M, Tejada-Vera B
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 May 31; 61(9):1-128.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
7. Duggan JE, Gillingham R, Greenlees J. Mortality and lifetime income: evidence from US Social Security records. IMF Staff Papers. 2008; 55 (4):566–594. [ Ref list ]
Differences in life expectancy due to race and educational differences are widening, and many may not catch up.
Olshansky SJ, Antonucci T, Berkman L, Binstock RH, Boersch-Supan A, Cacioppo JT, Carnes BA, Carstensen LL, Fried LP, Goldman DP, Jackson J, Kohli M, Rother J, Zheng Y, Rowe J
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug; 31(8):1803-13.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
13. Bound J, Geronimus A, Rodriguez J, Waidmann T. The Implications of Differential Trends in Mortality for Social Security Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2014. [ Ref list ]
Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century.
Case A, Deaton A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8; 112(49):15078-83.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Age-aggregation bias in mortality trends.
Gelman A, Auerbach J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 16; 113(7):E816-7.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States.
Murray CJ, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, Tomijima N, Bulzacchelli MT, Iandiorio TJ, Ezzati M
PLoS Med. 2006 Sep; 3(9):e260.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States.
Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, Cohen RD, Heck KE, Balfour JL, Yen IH
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul; 88(7):1074-80.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Even as mortality fell in most US counties, female mortality nonetheless rose in 42.8 percent of counties from 1992 to 2006.
Kindig DA, Cheng ER
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar; 32(3):451-8.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
42. Fuchs V. Who Shall Live? New York, NY: Basic Books; 1974. [ Ref list ]
43. Skinner J. Causes and consequences of regional variations in health care. In: Pauly M, McGuire T, Barros P, editors. Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2012. [ Ref list ]
51. Finkelstein A, McKnight R. What did Medicare do? the initial impact of Medicare on mortality and out of pocket medical spending. J Public Econ. 2008; 92 :1644–1668. [ Ref list ]
DOES MEDICARE SAVE LIVES?
Card D, Dobkin C, Maestas N
Q J Econ. 2009; 124(2):597-636.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Community-level comparisons between the grocery store environment and individual dietary practices.
Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Curry S, Wagner E, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kristal A
Prev Med. 1991 Mar; 20(2):250-61.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
59. Caiazzo F, Ashok A, Waitz IA, Yim SHL, Barrett SRH. Air pollution and early deaths in the United States, part I: quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005. Atmos Environ. 2013; 79 :198–208. [ Ref list ]
Review Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review.
Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper S, Hillemeier M, Ross N, Kaplan GA, Wolfson M
Milbank Q. 2004; 82(1):5-99.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Review Income inequality and health: a causal review.
Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar; 128():316-26.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Review How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact?
Gravelle H
BMJ. 1998 Jan 31; 316(7128):382-5.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Review Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us?
Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21():543-67.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
State-level income inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel study.
Lochner K, Pamuk E, Makuc D, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I
Am J Public Health. 2001 Mar; 91(3):385-91.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Review Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence.
Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr; 62(7):1768-84.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Religious involvement and U.S. adult mortality.
Hummer RA, Rogers RG, Nam CB, Ellison CG
Demography. 1999 May; 36(2):273-85.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
Review Social capital, mortality, cardiovascular events and cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies.
Choi M, Mesa-Frias M, Nuesch E, Hargreaves J, Prieto-Merino D, Bowling A, Snith GD, Ebrahim S, Dale C, Casas JP
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec; 43(6):1895-920.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
72. Sullivan D, von Wachter T. Job displacement and mortality: an analysis using administrative data. Q J Econ. 2009; 124 :1265–1306. [ Ref list ]
73. Ruhm CJ. Are recessions good for your health? Q J Econ. 2000; 115 :617–650. [ Ref list ]
74. National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. [Accessed March 28, 2016]; The moment of truth. https://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf . [ Ref list ]
Review
Committee on the Long-Run Macroeconomic Effects of the Aging U.S. Population—Phase II, Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Mathematical Sciences and Their Applications, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
. 2015 Sep 17; ():.

[ PubMed ] [ Ref list ]
75. Cesarini D, Lindqvist E, Östling R, Wallace B. Wealth, health and child development: evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. Q J Econ [ Ref list ]
Support Center Support Center
External link. Please review our privacy policy .
NLM
NIH
DHHS
USA.gov

National Center for Biotechnology Information , U.S. National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike , Bethesda MD , 20894 USA
Policies and Guidelines | Contact

Preferences Turn off
External link. Please review our privacy policy .
statistics
Making articles easier to read in PMC Close

We are experimenting with display styles that make it easier to read articles in PMC. Our first effort uses eBook readers, which have several "ease of reading" features already built in.

These PMC articles are best viewed in the iBooks reader . You may notice problems with the display of certain parts of an article in other eReaders.
Cancel Download article

